Re: [FLASH-BUGS] extraneous code in amr_prolong_cc.F90

From: Jonathan Dursi (ljdursi@eugenia.asci.uchicago.edu)
Date: Tue Apr 02 2002 - 14:31:49 CST

  • Next message: David J. Lin: "[FLASH-BUGS] small bug in conductivity"

    On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 08:34:25AM -0500, Knudsen, Steven wrote:
    > Apparently, lines 203-213 and 290-299 in amr_prolong_cc.F90 have no effect,
    > because nrecv is incremented, then zeroed out.

    Yes; that is left over from an (apparently) incomplete removal of some
    other code. We'll remove it in the next release. At any rate, its
    impact should be zero, as a good optimizing compiler will eliminate it.

            - Jonathan 

    -- 
ljdursi@flash.uchicago.edu

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 02 2002 - 12:54:05 CST