yes, I added the fixed to the cylindrical and spherical prolongation
routines that I wrote -- I did not get around to the cartesian ones yet,
mainly because that would break a lot of the test suite, and I didn't want
to deal with that at the time.
Mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Zingale
UCO/Lick Observatory
UCSC
Santa Cruz, CA 95064
phone: (831) 459-5246
fax: (831) 459-5265
e-mail: zingale@ucolick.org
web: http://www.ucolick.org/~zingale
"Once something has been approved by the Government, It's no longer immoral."
-- Reverend Lovejoy
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Tomasz Plewa wrote:
> Robi, Mike -
>
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 01:00:44PM -0600, Mike Zingale wrote:
> > Hi Robi, the only problem that I am aware of with those prolongation
> > routines is that the monotonicity constraint does not operate on the mass
> > fractions as a whole, so it does not guarantee that they sum to one at the
> > end -- this is something that I've been meaning to fix, but have not had
> > the time.
>
> Regarding consistency of the species interpolation, I recall
> cylindrical and spherical versions required some fixes (will appear in
> the next release); cartesian version constraints the data by coarse
> zones without making any distinction between variables.
>
> In either case, I do not think that any interpolant we currently use
> quarantees to produce smooth perfectly monotone data. Striping seems
> odd, though.
>
> Tomek
> --
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Nov 05 2003 - 13:36:13 CST