On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 01:36:10PM -0600, Mike Zingale wrote:
> yes, I added the fixed to the cylindrical and spherical prolongation
> routines that I wrote -- I did not get around to the cartesian ones yet,
> mainly because that would break a lot of the test suite, and I didn't want
> to deal with that at the time.
The two non-cartesian versions required additional modifications. But
the new cartesian version uses quite different interpolation method
and I did not want to spend time on analyzing it. Breaking the test
suite is not worrisome - this can be looked into - but making
interpolants monotone requires using different interpolation technique
and more time. Hope Robi's case is something simpler.
Tomek
--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Nov 05 2003 - 13:48:26 CST