Re: [FLASH-BUGS] Bug in quadratic_cartesian interpolation scheme?

From: Robi Banerjee (banerjee@physics.mcmaster.ca)
Date: Thu Nov 06 2003 - 15:18:24 CST

  • Next message: Mike Zingale: "Re: [FLASH-BUGS] Bug in quadratic_cartesian interpolation scheme?"

    Hi Mike,

      I have set up a web page showing the outcome of the quadratic_cartesian
    interpolation scheme compared with the old second order one. You can
    find the page at:
    http://physwww.physics.mcmaster.ca/~banerjee/problem.html

      I used FLASH 2.3 on our Alpha with Tru64 Unix. I initialized the
    the data with a simulation done with Zeus, therefore it is not easy
    for me to rewrite the code for a 2D simulation. Here are some more
    information of the modules I used:

    REQUIRES driver/time_dep
    REQUIRES hydro
    REQUIRES gravity/poisson/multigrid
    REQUIRES materials/eos/gamma
    REQUIRES source_terms/cool/radloss
    REQUIRES mesh/amr/paramesh2.0

      The 'stripes' appear in all variables but are most prominent
    in the velocities. Maybe the 'stripes' show up only in regions
    with a large gradient of the variables?

      Robi

    On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Mike Zingale wrote:

    > Hi Robi, the only problem that I am aware of with those prolongation
    > routines is that the monotonicity constraint does not operate on the mass
    > fractions as a whole, so it does not guarantee that they sum to one at the
    > end -- this is something that I've been meaning to fix, but have not had
    > the time.
    >
    > I have not seen a problem like you describe. More information would be
    > useful -- especially if you could reproduce the problem in 2-d, as it
    > would be easier to debug then.
    >
    > Mike
    >
    > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > Michael Zingale
    > UCO/Lick Observatory
    > UCSC
    > Santa Cruz, CA 95064
    >
    > phone: (831) 459-5246
    > fax: (831) 459-5265
    > e-mail: zingale@ucolick.org
    > web: http://www.ucolick.org/~zingale
    >
    > "Once something has been approved by the Government, It's no longer immoral."
    > -- Reverend Lovejoy
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Robi Banerjee wrote:
    >
    > > Hi,
    > >
    > > I ran into a problem (non convergence in the Riemann solver)
    > > using the new 'quadratic_cartesian' interpolation scheme in a
    > > 3D simulation including selfgravity.
    > > Looking into the details after a refinement step I figured
    > > that the data in the newly refined blocks develop stripe-like
    > > structures. This leads, for instance, to overshooting in
    > > velocities, resp. mach numbers.
    > > Using the old interpolation scheme (second_order_old)
    > > everything is fine and the variables are smoothly prolongated
    > > onto the newly refined blocks.
    > >
    > > Is this a known problem, or is there a problem with the
    > > new (quadratic_cartesian) interpolation scheme?
    > >
    > > If you need more information, please don't hesitate to
    > > ask for (e.g. 2D slices of the simulation data with the
    > > two different interpolations schemes)
    > >
    > > Thank you,
    > > Robi
    > >
    > > ====================================
    > > Robi Banerjee
    > > Department of Physics and Astronomy
    > > ABB-320, McMaster University
    > > Hamilton, ON L8S 4M1
    > > CANADA
    > > e-mail: banerjee@physics.mcmaster.ca
    > > phone : (905) 525-9140 x 23189
    > > fax : (905) 546-1252
    > >
    > >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Nov 06 2003 - 15:18:30 CST