Hi, we did spend considerable time studying mg performance and, at least
on the surface, the ratios you quote are not at all expected. If you send
me the flash.par and setup_call text we will run the problem here and try
to understand what is happening.
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Garrelt Mellema wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This message may appear twice, since I already sent it yesterday, but as far as
> I can see, it failed to appear in the list.
>
> I wondered whether anyone could enlighten me on the following.
> I am trying to use FLASH 2.3 with the multigrid poisson solver for gravity in a
> 3D problem and I am having some performance problems.
>
> For now I just want to study the collapse of Jeans unstable cloud.
>
> I use 5 grid levels, and the default values for everything
> concerning the multigrid poisson solver. The boundaries are set to be isolated.
> This gives me a tot_blocks of about a 1000.
>
> For this setup every time step takes about 4 wall clock minutes using 16 processors of
> an SGI Origen 3800 (i.e. something like an hour of single CPU time). This makes the
> poisson solver about a 100 times slower than the hydro.
>
> Is this what is to be expected? I had better hopes after reading that the Poisson solvers
> in FLASH2.3 are much faster than in the previous releases.
>
> I haven't yet experimented with changing the tolerances, number of V-cycles, etc.
> since I imagine that the default values should give a reasonable accuracy and CPU time.
>
> Does anyone have any experience with running a problem like this?
>
> Thanks,
> Garrelt Mellema
>
>
Received on Thu Aug 14 09:37:41 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 31 2006 - 21:20:48 CDT